« Morning Smoke: Congress Missed Opportunities to Demand Renegotiation of AIG Employee Contacts, Bailout Watchdog Says | Main | POGO Not Cheering for Obama's Pick of a Nuclear Power Cheerleader for Vacant NRC Seat »

Oct 15, 2009

Comments

Dfens

The last time I read the US Constitution, the Legislative branch was charged with spending money, not the Executive branch. Funny how irrelevant that all seems now, isn't it? I find it equally funny how deeply troubled Gates is by the expenditure of $2.5 billion for which we will actually recieve 10 flyable C-17 aircraft, but he doesn't bat an eye when Boeing buys its way into the C-130 AMP contract via Darlene Druyun and then through incompetence and mismanagement they are able to get that contract cancelled before we get a single upgraded airplane. I guess if you spend $2.5 billion and actually get something for it then that's bad, but if you spend $1.5 billion and get nothing, then that's good? Of course, the only ones getting nothing are the US taxpayers. Boeing took home $150 million in profit. Their subcontractors took home millions more. They tied up thousands of engineers and skilled workers that could have been making real contributions to our economy for a decade, but who cares about that? Obviously not the US taxpayer, or they'd be pissed. Lucky Boeing, the US taxpayers are too stupid to care.

The comments to this entry are closed.