« More Los Alamos Whistleblowers | Main | Troops in Iraq Question Private Military Contractors »

Mar 22, 2005


David R. Amos

Gotcha POGO I saved the proof of my postings. T fact that you left one of Depoty Dog's postings and yet removed many others before and afterwards makes your malice towards me and the simple truth of our matter undeniable. Your peoplr have proven to me that your organization is fake and no better than any other corporate controled Blog such as Laughing at Liberals and Free Republic etc etc. Sooner or later I will hope to sue your organization in the same complaint with Superman and Deputy Dog. i will be calling your offices tomorrow to prove my sincerity to you. Once i have identified a lawyer in your midst. i will send them hard copy of Deputy Dog and Superman's malice to stress test his ethics to the mmax. Thanks at least for proving for me that even the World Wide web is corporate controled. Freedom even in cyberspace must be defended proptly or all is lost in the real world. I find it interesting that you let my Blogs last so long and yet erased them on the very day the Homeland Security Act was blessed once more by a very corrupt Congress.
Veritas Vincit
David Raymond Amos.

Bob "Deputy Dog" O'Meara

All you had to do to prevent your family from being "thrown" out on the street, was to buy everyone elses share. Didn't that ever occur to you? It is what most normal people would do who only own 25% of something. Buy the other 75%. You two think you can just claim both houses as your own. Thats right, Jean "homesteaded" Milton. Try looking up what the homestead act is. When you thought I was breaking into my own house in Mano, did you ever look at the back door? Always unlocked. I wish it was me destroying the beach house, but I'm sorry to say it was the new owners. All that equipment you saw belonged to them. All the property that was left in the house or on the property was moved or disposed of by the new owner. Thats what happens when you refuse to move yor crap. It is moved for you and at your expense, not ours.Try looking at your own wifes signatures. Which one does she claim is forged now. Seems she can't make up her mind. Oh thats right, she was suffering a nervous breakdown. How long did this breakdown last for? Seems to me she was still working during most of it. First it was over 911, then over the Kickhams, then it was the three of us. You guys should pick one story and stick to it. I think it was over you and the countless times you left to go on another scumbag tour. We all remember them. One of your best was summer of 1990. Remember Jeans delicate condition. You were gone for four and a half to five months while she sat around pissing and moaning about you. Why, I don't know since she does fine without you. Getting back to her signatures, I have about twenty copies of her signature dating as far back as 1980. They all look the same. Maybe thats why no one pays any attention to your bs about forgeries. You have accused a few people of this forgery. Have you made up your mind who you are going to "sue" for that. You must be up in the thousands of people who you are going to sue. I guess that's your full time job. There must be some correct paperwork on file in all these courts. It looks like both houses sold, while you kept yelling that we can't do it. You never did tell anyone why we could not, other than you saying we couldn't. You see where that went. I remember you saying in one of your many documents that you two were willing to match the first offer on the house. What ever happened to that? You and I both know. On Ole Tom, it's a kilt,,,,,,,on you,it's one of your wifes old skirts. You seem to dump on P-town. Seems to me that many of your friends,or former friends, and family go to P-town.Coming from a man in a skirt, I would not put too much credibility in what you say. You keep shitting on Yankees,,,,,,,,, both your children and your wife are Yankees. Thank God you will never be one. In case you are wondering, we are each enjoying our share of the sales, as we should be and so could you. Hopefully those storage fees are not getting too high. Maybe Triple M has alreadt auctioned of your junk. I was able to get my tools back before everything was packed up. You do remember the things you borrowed many years ago and failed to return them. I know that was just an oversight, being the honest man that you are. You should also look into how a deed works. We did not need a deed in our name to sell either property. I'm sure you being such a smart fellow, you looked into that and found a "Dave" loophole. Again,,,,nice try. You're suing the Queen? I didn't think the Queen had anything to do with Canada anymore. But I could be wrong. Don't really care. More useless info. I'm sure she responds to all your correspondence. She better if she knows what is good for her. Don't want her on the Dave list. Weren't you still married when you were messing around with jean and her friend. I really need a smart lawyer to argue with you. You still haven't seen through Barry yet. First he represents you, or Jean, or whoever. Then he Quits because you two don't pay him. Then he represents you because why, you're a political prisoner. That's cute. How much did you have to give him up front? I'm sure a nice chunk. The Mano money came in handy. Now he represents Jean. Thats good too. Same as with Mano, hire a lawyer after everything is done. Kind of like locking the barndoor after the horse is stolen. But this is how you two work, againest everyone and you achieve nothing. This pre-trial has nothing to do withus. It's Greg Chandler verses Jean O'Meara, no one else. Not you either. You need your own country, Daveland, where you can make up all the rules and laws. You don't seem to like any in the States or in Canada anymore. What's up with that. King Dave,,,,,,has a nice ring to it, don't you think. Lets go vacation in Daveland,,, there are no laws there. None that anyone has to obey, anyway. Does your new friend and lawyer know how you feel about lawyers? Or is he the second one that you like? This must all be good for you,,,,your latest excuse to stay away from your family and play with your friends. Thats what a husband and proud papa does. Do you have that in your book? I haven't seen in the stores. What ever happened to the millions you were getting from it? What ever happened to the millions you were awarded in court? Maybe that was another day the US Postal Service was screwing with your mail. With all this money you should be sitting pretty fat about now. Oh well, wish I was as well off as you.

Dean R Ray

A Freemason Speaks
Author Stephen Knight wrote one of the seminal books on freemasonry called 'The Brotherhood' in 1983. During the course of his research for this book he was introduced to a man known as 'Christopher', a mason of the highest 33rd degree ranking. In the Cafe Royal, London, Christopher showed him the papers demonstrating the authenticity of his masonic rank and told Knight that he was keen to "stop the rot" in freemasonry. Stephen Knight asked him what a person might have to fear from a group of influential freemasons if circumstances made him, for instance, a threat to them in the business world; or if he discovered they were using masonry for corrupt purposes; or had fallen a victim of their misuse of freemasonry and would not heed warnings not to oppose them.
'Christopher', 33rd degree mason: "It is not difficult to ruin a man and I will tell you how it is done time and again. There are more than half a million brethren under the jurisdiction of the Grand Lodge. Standards have been falling for twenty or thirty years. It is too easy to enter the Craft, so many men of dubious morals have joined. The secrecy and power attract such people, and when they come the decent leave. The numbers of people who would never have been considered for membership in the fifties are getting larger all the time. If only five per cent of freemasons use - abuse - the Craft for selfish or corrupt ends it means there are 25,000 of them. The figure is much closer to twelve or thirteen per cent now."
Stephen Knight: "Christopher explained that masonry's nationwide organization of men from most walks of life provided one of the most efficient private intelligence networks imaginable. Private information on anybody in the country could normally be accessed very rapidly through endless permutations of masonic contacts - police, magistrates, solicitors, bank managers. Post Office staff, doctors, government employees. Bosses of firms. A dossier of personal data could be built up on anybody very quickly. When the major facts of an individual's life were known, areas of vulnerability would become apparent. Perhaps he is in financial difficulties; perhaps he has some social vice - if married he might 'retain a mistress' or have a proclivity for visiting prostitutes; perhaps there is something in his past he wishes keep buried, some guilty secret, a criminal offence (easily obtainable through freemason police of doubtful virtue), or other blemish on his character: all these and more could be discovered via the wide-ranging masonic network of 600,000 contacts, a great many of whom were indisposed to do favours for one another because that had been their prime motive for joining. Even decent masons could often be 'conned' into providing information on the basis that 'Brother Smith needs this to help the person involved'. The adversary would even sometimes be described as a fellow mason to the Brother from whom information was sought - perhaps someone with access to his bank manager. The 'good' mason would not go to the lengths of checking with Freemason's Hall whether or not this was so. If the 'target' was presented as a Brother in distress by a fellow mason, especially a fellow lodge member, that would be enough for any upright member of the craft. Sometimes this information gathering process - often involving a long chain of masonic contacts all over the country and possibly abroad - would be necessary. Enough would be known in advance about the adversary to initiate any desired action against him.
'Christopher', the 33rd degree mason: "Solicitors are very good at it. Get your man involved in something legal - it need not be serious - and you have him."
Stephen Knight: "Masons can bring about the situation where credit companies and banks withdraw credit facilities from individual clients and tradesmen, said my informant. Banks can foreclose. People who rely on the telephone for their work can be cut off for long periods. Masonic employees of local authorities can arrange for a person's drains to be inspected and extensive damage to be reported, thus burdening the person with huge repair bills; workmen carrying out the job can 'find' - in reality cause - further damage. Again with regard to legal matters, a fair hearing is hard to get when a man in ordinary circumstances is in financial difficulties. If he is trying to fight a group of unprincipled freemasons skilled in using the 'network' it will be impossible because masonic DHSS and Law Society officials can delay applications for Legal Aid endlessly."
'Christopher', 33rd degree mason: "Employers, if they are freemasons or not, can be given private information about a man who has made himself an enemy of masonry. At worst he will be dismissed (if the information is true) or consistently passed over for promotion. Masonic doctors can also be used. But for some reason doctors seem to be the least corruptible men. There are only two occurrences of false medical certificates issued by company doctors to ruin the chances of an individual getting a particular job which I know about. It's not a problem that need greatly worry us like the rest.
"Only the fighters have any hope of beating the system once it's at work against them. Most people, fighters or not, are beaten in the end, though. It's.... you see, I... you finish up not knowing who you can trust. You can get no help because your story sounds so paranoid that you are thought a crank, one of those nuts who think the whole world is a conspiracy against them. It is a strange phenomenon. By setting up a situation that most people will think of as fantasy, these people can poison every part of person's life. If they give in they go under. If they don't give in it's only putting off the day because if they fight, so much unhappiness will be brought to the people around them that there will likely come a time when even their families turn against them out of desperation. When that happens and they are without friends wherever they look, they become easy meat. The newspapers will not touch them. "There is no defense against an evil which only the victims and perpetrators know exists."
Stalkers/terrorist break down:

Ordinary people have legitimate family, friends that can account for their existance.
Stalkers live on false legends, and have many other stalkers back up their claim to live an ordinary existence
Strength: is anyone can be decieved due to the fact that we tend to believe references.
weakness:Deeper investigation would show the phony legends and references these people depend on.
Conclusion: The stalkers would have to avoid deep investigations. Stalkers will leave a trail of victims as careers are seldom left to one target.

Targeting victims Jobs
Ordinary citizens are motivated to do the job in trade for money
Stalkers have to be able to do the job plus harm the target and seam motivated for the money. This is made easier under phony investigations. The stalkers can approach the target's work with an official police badge and ask the company for assistance. The company will decide to terminate the employee at the earliest convenience.
Strength: The stalkers can create competition against the target. Companies can be enticed to hire someone of more experience. Stalkers can inform companies of false investigations.
Weakness: Victims can inform the Companies of the truth and reveal the deception if the job is snafued anyway. If the Stalkers are exposed the trail will light up instantly as the events will probably be remembered by the employer. Especially if he sees the target on television telling the truth.
Conclusion: Eventually there should be an adequate pattern to follow that a deep investigation could uncover. Police involvement in the investigations could implicate the players involve working within the R.C.M.P.

Street Theatre
Ordinary Citizens behave in a manner they wish to be treated themselves
Stalkers do not care and have only one agenda, to disrupt the targets everyday schedual.
Strength: The stalkers can create a feelling of hopelessness, create hardships as more and more stalkers become involved. Create uncertainty that would make the victim disoriented and phocused on minor things.
weakness: Pictures and recordings can expose the harrassment and pave the way to a deeper investigation.
Conclusion : Exposure tell family and friends show the recordings, sell them the truth gently. Ask them to storm the police station and demand a deep investigation. upload to the net all evidense so if anything did happen it could not be covered up.

Noisy neighbours
Ordinary neighbours can be nasty depending on who lives beside you. Partiers can keep you up all night and that might be perfectly normal.
Stalkers often never get caught when you call the police. Stalkers know when to be noisy and when to deny you proof. When the ceiling seems like the person is going to stomp right through and you call the authorities. Just before police arrive the place goes silent this is a definate yes that they are Stalkers. When the stalkers surround a target they tend to take up space. Possibly many innocent neighbours are targeted so they can get close to you. Notify neighbours with a letter about multistalking and try not to reveal you are the source unless absolutely neccesary.
Strength: Sleep deprivation is a powerful tool. Stalkers can break the target much easier if the target is not coherent.
Weakness: The property can be linked to somebody that can be investigated. Deeper investigation would either reveal a false name or a stalker that has stalked before. Stalkers have to have an excuse why they are home all day, try to find out what the excuse is. If you know the name of the stalker do a internet background check. Look up case files and see if they show up stalking other Targets and were taken to court.
Conclusion: Always be able to tell the difference between noisy neighbours and stalkers. If you falsely accuse you help the stalkers prove you are incompetant.

Internet resources to search for:


Deep investigations would require the aquivalent of a murder investigation. Suicides are self explanatory and do not require scrutiny. This is why the stalkers stalk but have good restraint to avoid hurting the target To break the target, and even ask them to give up is just a tip of the iceburg of methods used.

You are the total sum thoughts you think everyday which means if everyday you live in fear of the stalkers you become the rabbit that they mock and chase easily. Reading can empower you and bring you to a level of understanding how the stalking works.

Excellent Books to read:
"BiBle" study it thourough and you will have faith and enlightenment in these troubled times.
"How to win friends and influence people" by andrew Carnagy this book will allow you to build a stronghold of friends and allow you more power to tell the difference between friend and foe.
"criminology" can be found in the library it is good to study how the laws are made and manipulated.
"university of success" by og mandino learn to become a salesman this will help you sell your story to the public and help look for work.
"road less traveled" by scott peck this book can reveal the real issues behind your reactions
"psycocybernetics" this books helps to discover how the self esteem works and can give you a shield against stalkers.
"thinking big" this book will train you to look at the big picture instead of swimming in the small details that can hold you down.
"48 laws of power" by Robert Greene This book will show you what true ruthlessness is and make you more aware of the stalkers way of thinking.
"Art of war" by suntzu Learn how to create decoys tell them one thing and do another. Know your enemy, research your objectives never reveal your true plans.

Sometimes stalkers can be spotted in several ways:

Familiar face in the crowd always there just as you head around the corner. In public places if someone goes to the bathrooms looks in and then walks in view to count heads then sits back in the shadows. These are trained watchers. They most likely will not interact but most likely the stalkers are nearby and ready for their performance.

After a street performance take pictures of every car in the lot even if you are in the biggest mall in your town. These pictures will allow an investigator to help find the perpetrators and maybe weed out some of the silent players that are more valuable to know about than the stalkers. The stalkers are most likely just individuals who are approached and want to work for cash or the fantasy of being james bond.

Handy tools for fighting back

computer note book
Digital recorder capable of recording up to seven hours
digital camera
upload everything to a stalker website set up by you, try not to jeapardize other sites when revealing names and places. My personal favorite is msn groups

There just might be an enemy of the stalkers out there and providing this information would help expose their network and make them very nervous. Applying the pressure back at them, creating the uncertainty that they desire you to have.

Yours Truly
Dean Ray

NO R.C.M.P will investigate my claims
Break in report updated...
Lois Sheplawy
-noticed a Icecream pail lid with a chain sitting on it in her room near the door . noon December 12 2004. picture has been taken with disposable camera.

(anything happens use event number 04300763. A file has been made when trying to find out what happened to the satelite Bell expressview.)

Dean Ray
- noticed two finishing nails in bedroom closest to kitchen. Nails located on Eastern wall towards elevator. A hook was screwed into the ceiling very close to Eastern wall and the wall which has the window. December 13 2004

Note that apartment was painted and it is impossible for the nails to be left behind. Landlord specifically noted we are only allowed to use one wall and Lois Sheplawy chose the living room eastern wall.

Dean Ray
-noticed more holes peppered throughout the apartment. Extreme amounts of nail damage in the bedroom nearest the kitchen. 2004 DEC 14

Lois Sheplawy
-noticed religious tapes erased, broken door on closet, roll of quarters stolen
2005 may 04

Lois Sheplawy
-noticed dish washing soap drained faster than usual 2005 may 4

David R. Amos

Sent by fax November 1, 2003
J. Michael Wiggins, Acting Assistant
Attorney General for Civil Rights and
William H. Jordan his counsel
C/O Steven H. Rosenbaum, Chief
Mellie H. Nelson, Deputy Chief
Andrew J. Barrick, Attorney
Special Litigation Section
Civil Rights Division, U.S. Department of Justice
P.O. Box 66400
Washington, D.C. 20035-6400
Phone (202) 514-6249
Fax (202) 514-6273

Lets just say that I know a little about you Federalists and you know a lot about Mr. Ashcroft and his BUDDYS. Both Mr. Wiggins and Mr. Gordon would have a hard time convincing me that they don’t know Bob Barr or Alan Dershowitz. I find you good old boys from Atlanta just as interesting as the bluebloods and the Irish Catholics from Beantown. I am more than willing to argrue in court with y’all  Y’all of you should start acting within the scope of your employment and enforce the federal civil rights statutes, in particular the area you label as number two. Perhaps you should remind Mr. Kunicich of the past doings in his home State before he attempts to oversee the bad acting federal law enforcement teams. I am forwarding a copy of this letter to his lady-friend/lawyer and to the Judiciary Committee.
I will also present to the Judiciary Committee some of the actual wiretap tapes that are mentioned throughout the documents. First I must inform the people recorded on the tapes that their civil rights have been violated and that I did everything I could to protect their rights while trying to bring the truth into view. Some of the tapes were actually filed in the U.S. District Court for the District of New Hampshire for a period of three days. Everybody knows that the U.S. District court clerk is a liar. The answer was filed in a timely fashion and on a different date than the clerk claimed. The filing that was returned will be used as evidence in litigation against the USA within a very righteous complaint even if I do say so myself.
As you can see, within the attached documents I did everything I could to make the many law enforcement authorities do their job. Now I will simply take it to the people. Maybe they can fix the problem with the jury box and the ballot box. For what it is worth, I sincerely believe that every representative should run as an independent and vote only in the side of the best interests of their own constituents. All members of congress should only be allowed to have that seat for one term.
It appears that one term in congress has the potential to corrupt even the best of us. To me, speaking for the people should be an honourable duty and not a vocation. Politicians should be allowed to make their point then go back to living in the real world and allow others to speak. Why have someone such as evil old J. Strom Thruman or drunken Ted Kennedy represent us forever when there are so many other decent folks without blood on their hands who could do the job much more diligently? As for the jury box I will speak plainly to them in order to prove my own point. I cannot vote nor do I want to. I would never wish to be a politician I am a private person that will not hesitate to defend my kin from anyone who attacks them or their interests. I speak for myself and my Clan Pro Se. That is my duty. Your duty is to protect the federal civil rights of all the people including me. I have the same rights as anyone else under Tittle 42. Government lawyers are not above the law nor are they immune from prosecution if they do not act within the scope of their employment. If you disagree say so. I will not hesitate to argue it with you in front of a jury.
The following I have gleaned from your website. May I suggest you start asking the various law enforcement agencies some hard questions on my behalf.
“The Special Litigation Section enforces federal civil rights statutes in four major areas: (1) conditions of institutional confinement; (2) law enforcement misconduct; (3) access to reproductive health facilities and places of religious worship; and (4) protection of institutionalized persons' religious exercise rights.”
“Law Enforcement Misconduct. The Special Litigation Section enforces the police misconduct provision of the Violent Crime Control and Law Enforcement Act of 1994, which authorizes the Attorney General to seek equitable and declaratory relief to redress a pattern or practice of illegal conduct by law enforcement agencies or agencies responsible for the administration of juvenile justice. The Section also enforces the Omnibus Crime Control and Safe Streets Act of 1968, which authorizes the Attorney General to initiate civil litigation to remedy a pattern or practice of discrimination based on race, color national origin, gender or religion involving services by law enforcement agencies receiving financial assistance from the Department of Justice.
The Section has successfully engaged in resolving and investigating allegations against police departments by taking a cooperative approach. Under 42 U.S.C. § 14141, the Attorney General is authorized to file lawsuits seeking court orders to reform police departments engaging in a pattern or practice of violating citizens' federal rights. The Section is continuing investigations and negotiations with a number of cities. The Cincinnati Police investigation recently reached a settlement and investigations were opened into several other departments.
The Cincinnati settlement agreement is an example of the success of the Section's approach to investigations of police departments. In April 2001, the City of Cincinnati was literally and figuratively smoldering in the wake of riots touched off by community reaction to a number of controversial police shootings.
One year later, Attorney General Ashcroft presided over the signing ceremony for an agreement between the Department of Justice and the City of Cincinnati that implemented significant reforms with respect to uses of force by the Cincinnati Police Department. Moreover, by engaging in a collaborative negotiation process with the City, the police, and community groups, the Department of Justice agreement will be jointly monitored and enforced along with a separate agreement among the community groups and the City. This unique and historic arrangement achieved real reform without the need for protracted litigation or a consent decree. It reflected the Section's desire to help fix the problems in Cincinnati.
In addition to these agreements, the Section continues to ensure implementation of consent decrees with the police departments of Steubenville, Ohio and Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania. In United States v. City of Steubenville (S.D. Ohio), the Section filed its complaint and a consent decree resolving our claims of excessive force, false arrests, improper searches and seizures, and related management failures in 1997. The Section continues to monitor compliance with the decree. The city attorney and others have noted the improvements in the police department since entry of the decree in press reports. The Section continues to review the regular reports filed by the local monitor. In United States v. City of Pittsburgh (W.D. Penn.), the court entered a consent decree resolving the Section's claims of excessive force, false arrests, improper searches and seizures, and related management failures in 1997. The Section is monitoring compliance with the consent decree. This includes a regular review of the auditor's report on compliance with the consent decree.”
Methinks it high time the Feds start taking a serious look at Massachusetts. The window dressing of the present Judiciary Committee investigations is merely a mask of virtue over the face of evil. Doesn’t anybody realize that Senator Kerry and Bill Delahunt were both State District Attorneys when a lot of this shit went down? They both should have asked many questions of the State and Federal Authorities a very long time ago. If you do not think that there is a cover up then you should have your youngest child read real slow to you the U.S Attorney’s, Michael J. Sullivan, “Ex Parte” statement about it and then Judge Carey’s judgments the following month. Trust me you are already mentioned in my true story about these matters. You choose how you wish to be remembered. The tale is far more interesting than Michael Fredrickson’s fictional renditions of the facts. I do bear Witness for the Dead and I do possess a Cinderella Affidavit that implicates the Secret Service in the conspiracy to cover-up crimes.
One way or another, I will Cya’ll in Court
David R. Amos
153 Alvin Ave
Milton, MA 02186
P.S. I would prefer you stood with me. After all I am just an Alien Biker acting as a Court Jester when my much neglected real job is Mr. Mom. I just went under cover.

David R. Amos

Clark Kent Ervin November 12, 2003
Acting Inspector General of
the U.S. Department of Homeland Security
Washington, D.C. 20528

Need I remind you of Rule 9 of the Code of Ethics hereto attached. May I strongly suggest that you waltz around the various departments of the DHS, drop my name and ask a few questions. W. Ralph Basham , Director, United States Secret Service, would be a good place to start. After all it was he who sent the Secret Service to see me to investigate false allegations but I bet that it was Mr. Webster who had an influence on their not investigating Bank Fraud. The recent developments in Boston with regards to the SEC and Putnam Investments must be great concern to the FEDS. Why else would they be calling me now after ignoring me for so long? Perhaps you should go talk to Eduardo Aguirre, Jr. about his fellas investigating me. I would like to know why the General Counsel of the DHS has not responded to my letter. Is he waiting the full six months like H. Marshall Jarrett did? November the 20th is the last day for your boss Attorney General Ashcroft to respond to me. After that date I can complain of him as an individual. Trust that I shall. I also suggest that you read the enclosed documents and listen to the tape, then apply your ethics while you ask yourself what you would do if you were me. Please surprise me and become the first Inspector General and in fact the first civil servant that acted within the scope of his employment.
Please find enclosed an exact copy of a letter sent to every U.S. Attorney in the USA just prior to the malicious side show held before Judge Borenstein in Norfolk Superior Court on September 29th. I suspect the recent developments about the SEC and the FBI in Beantown have caused him to delay his judgments of long delayed motions that he had no jurisdiction to hear. He need not be advised as to whether or not to dismiss Prima Facia complaints that belong in federal court. The irrefutable evidence supporting the allegations were filed and served with the complaints. He knew the truth when he read what remained of the dockets. The clerks’ actions in all courts were evil. The copy of wiretap tape numbered 139 is served upon you in confidence as officers of the court in order that it may be properly investigated.

Cya’ll in Court
David R. Amos
153 Alvin Ave.
Milton, MA. 02186

Davir R. Amos

----- Original Message -----
From: David Amos
To: info@pogo.org ; elliot.gerson@aspeninstitute.org ; pat.zindulka@aspeninstitute.org ; peter. reiling@aspeninstitute.org ; clark.ervin@aspeninstitute.org
Cc: brian@questionsquestions.net ; plough@ploughshares.ca ; moto maniac ; cei@nbnet.nb.ca ; kbar@nbnet.nb.ca ; backtalk@motherjones.com ; Wes Penre@Illuminati News.com ; tpalmer@cato.org ; ghealy@cato.org ; david@davidakin.com ; McLellan.A@parl.gc.ca ; david@lutz.nb.ca ; cynthia.merlini@dfait-maeci.gc.ca ; ethics@harvard.edu ; INFO7@elections.ca ; inquiry.admin@bellnet.ca ; cotlei@parl.gc.ca ; Robert.Creedon@state.ma.us ; Brian.A.Joyce@state.ma.us ; Jack.Hart@state.ma.us ; Rep.WalterTimilty@hou.state.ma.us ; Rep.AStephenTobin@hou.state.ma.us
Sent: Wednesday, March 30, 2005 9:30 AM
Subject: I just left voicemail for Jim Spiegelman

Hey Fellas
I have picked you Mr. Gerson to send exactly the same material that I sent to two Solicitor Generals last year before I ran for Parliament in Canada. I am certain that material caused Theodore Olson to quit his job and your brand new fellow, Clark Kent Erwin to get the boot from his job right after the last Yankee election.
Obviously I picked you because of your own bragging. There is no need for me to expand upon things that you and I know to be true. It is merely my task to prove to the world that you are well aware of my concerns and allegations. Then if you and your Association does nothing to uphold the public trust, I will make it my best effort to embarrass you all in court in front of a jury of my peers. You people claim to inspire people to ethical leaders? I say Bullshit. What say you?
Say Hey to Superman for me. Will ya? Yea I know I just did but he likes to keep everything in confidence while his cohorts keep me falsely imprisoned. However I plan to call him to testify during my pending criminal trial as I have the right to do. I should be very interesting to see if he takes the fifth.
David R. Amos

"Elliot Gerson is responsible for the Aspen Institute's seminars, including the Executive Seminar, topical and custom seminars, and those offered in the Society of Fellows and Socrates programs. He also manages the Institute's public programs and activities, including the Aspen Ideas Festival. He is a graduate of Harvard College, Oxford University, where he was a Rhodes Scholar, and Yale Law School. As American Secretary of the Rhodes Trust, he manages the U.S. Rhodes Scholarships and is an advisor to the Mandela Rhodes Foundation in Cape Town, which focuses on African higher education and leadership. He was a U. S. Supreme Court clerk and has had a career including the practice of law, executive positions in state and federal government and a presidential campaign, president of leading insurance and healthcare companies, and service on many non-profit boards, especially in the arts."
----- Original Message -----
From: David Amos
To: jim.spiegelman@aspeninstitute.org
Sent: Wednesday, March 30, 2005 8:52 AM
Subject: Fw: This is going to get interesting

----- Original Message -----
From: David Amos
To: backtalk@motherjones.com
Sent: Monday, March 28, 2005 3:58 PM
Subject: Fw: This is going to get interesting

----- Original Message -----
From: David Amos
To: tpalmer@cato.org
Sent: Sunday, March 27, 2005 6:32 PM
Subject: Fw: This is going to get interesting

----- Original Message -----
From: David Amos
To: dante17678@hotmail.com
Sent: Sunday, March 27, 2005 10:18 AM
Subject: Fw: This is going to get interesting

----- Original Message -----
From: David Amos
To: rjvattuone@aol.com
Sent: Sunday, March 27, 2005 9:59 AM
Subject: This is going to get interesting

Hey Richard

Thanks for calling me back the other day. Here is my number in Boston 617 698-6549. I will be hitting the road shortly and I will be sending out to you hard copy of what I am sending to Scott Daruty. However there is a great deal more you should know ASAP. I am involved against the biggest and baddest of them all and we all know they play for keeps. It is important that you know much and have evidence of it in order to protect yourself. I know they moniter my phone calls and I have know doubt that they listen to the Canadain Cell as well. The fact that you spoke to me honestly and openly puts you in jeopardy. If you had acted like most lawyers, the bastards would leave you alone. If you come to my aid, they will attack you. Trust me it has happened before and I will send proof of it in the following emails. Some contain the Tiffs I mentioned I am curious to see if they get through AOL system. I hack been blocked by them in the past. I have not heard from Barry Bachrach since just after he warned me that the FBI was about to pounce on me on Oct 1st. It seems they have him running scared. I must do my best to protect honest men..

The following is what I just posted but it seems Bill Gates does not allow Tiff files in his sites so I will forward it to you to support what I said is true. Answer this email if and when you get it an I will send some others if you wish. However I think it would be better not to use AOL. As I said just get one in Yahoo or Hotmail they work better and are free.

From: motomaniac in response to Message 1 Sent: 3/27/2005 9:21 AM

In defense of Bobby Fischer I must say that he is just another man like me. He has his strengths and his weaknesses. Just like me. One particular forte of his, the amazing ability to play a game very well thrust him into the limelight for the whole wide world to study and examine his every move. More importantly I believe his fame caused him to become a pawn in the big big game. Although he had his right to privacy, the whole world dogged at his heels and critized his every action as a man. The Masters of War obviously tried use him to their advantage during the Cold War. He is not a stateman or a lawyer. He is simply a free thinking individual who has every right to speak his mind particularly after he has suffered through hell just because he plays chess so very well.

I say judge not lest ye be judged and mind your own mouth about things you do not know all the details of. I am far more outspoken than Bobby ever was and yet you have never even heard of my name. It is because the corporate controlled media is not permited to do so. I am nobody with any special talent that had caused me to be thrown into public scrutiny before I was compelled to speak out as Bobby has done. I do not have to agree or disagree with his every word over the years to understand his meaning and his troubles. That said, in all honesty it would behoove us both if his lawyer would listen to me and employ Bobby's fame to expose the truth of all that we say.

I am am not a perfect person and neither is Bobby. I do not know him nor do I judge him. Yet I do agree with with his standing in defense of his freedom. The Chessmaster has every right to spout off against the Masters of War because they have offended him greatly. It is for his attorney to weed out the truth and evidence of his convictions and present it in court in order to seek relief on his client's behalf. A jury of his peers will decide the truth of his matters not us bloggers without veiwing and hearing all the evidence. Forget what you may glean from the media. The information is controlled and slanted against him. Listen to what his lawyer says and what is used in arguement against him on the public record. Do not hold court in the media just gossip about things you know are true in order for the courts to act properly in the public interest.

Bobby has paid the devil his due and done time in his jails. It is time for him to seek relief. I have as well. I was summoned to jail in the USA while running for Parliament in Canada and held under the charges of "other". I will not want allow myself to be judged on just one particular act or deed. My criminal trial in the USA is coming very soon. I will have lots to say.

It is the average of all our days and deeds that speaks of us as the men we are. Like any game, it is what happens in the end that counts. Sometimes sacrifices must be made and sometimes mistakes are made. However once the word "checkmate" is declared, it is all over but the crying as long as we play by the rules and the fat lady sings in tune. I am more than happy to provide to Mr. Vattuone my evidence of much public corruption in order to support Bobby's lawsuit against the USA. It is high time the the Masters of War paid the fiddler and then be compelled to dance to a different tune as we make them fall on their own sword. No one is above the law. The public trust must be upheld or we are all losers in the the big big game. Forget Bobby and chess for a minute and listen to what he is saying through his attorney. I applaud is efforts in support of Bobby and his legal matters. I hope we get on like a house on fire. Any enemy of my foe should be a friend of mine. Bobby lawyer is your neighbor listen to him and then speak out to protect your own civil rights. What happened to Bobby and I could happen to you next. Get it?

If anyone wishes to challenge what I have said, respond to this message with a email account that can hold of 25 megs of attachments. I will send you Tiff files of legal documents etc. that will take you down path of of the Garden of Good and Evil that everybody knows is true. I simply made it a point to prove it. My particular forte that helped accomplish such a necessary task is that I am more stubburn than a pig, meaner than a snake and smarter than the average bear. Much to my chagrin, I am just an average sort of chess player and have much to learn from Bobby in that regard but I maintain that chess is just a game. Bobby was compelled to play a far more serious and deadly game just because of his love of a game. I do recognize his talent but my hat is off to him because of what he did and stood for as a man not a chess player. In regards to his legal actions methinks I can teach his attorney a trick or two of mine.

If anyone has any questions here is my phone number. 506 434-1379 Feel free to argue me and stress test my ethics to the max. It is your freedom as well as my own that I am protecting. I think anyone has the right to question my motives. I speak plainly and do not hide my identity. Integrity does not need a mask to hide behind. However men like John Ashcroft and all his cohorts need jails to cage honest men who speak their mind about their masks of virtue.

Bobby is just one man of many. His is fortunate that he is famous. Iceland would not do such things on behalf of the likes of me and many others. However Canada or Japan or whatever would do the same against me to support President Bush in a New York minute. In fact it already happened. The one file I have attached is the reason Clark Kent Ervin got fired immediately after the recent election. He long along proved to me that he was not interested in Truth Justice and the American Way and in fact he is a dumb as a post. I will wager I could beat him at chess. I know I played him like a fiddle as a lawyer and that is his game of choice. It was really to funny to me the advice he offered to others as he entered into the Aspen Crowd of nasty dudes. I feel the need to quote him. Many a govenment lawyer will understand why I am busting my gut laughing. I hope Bobby's lawyer does too.

Lauren Robinson POGO Fellow " Any advice for your fellow public servants?"

Clark Kent Ervin "Well, just do your job and let the political chips fall where they may. Unless your're willing to do that, it seems to me you shouldn't take the job in the first place."

My answer to his remark is No Shit Sherlock. The former Inspector General can expect a rather profound civil lawsuit. He must argue me Pro Se or a at least without government assistance on his behalf because he failed to act within the scope of his employment and he is now out of the job.

David Raymond Amos

The comments to this entry are closed.