« We don't need Jack Bauer...this time. | Main | POGO Supports OPEN Government Act »

Feb 15, 2005

Comments

Sebastien

I would like to remember everyone here that this is a innovative design. The V-22 itself might be doomed to fail, but the research made to make it what it is today and tommorrow WILL be of use in making future Tiltrotor aircrafts and potentially spawn cross-referenced designs in the future.

Don't be so short sighted. Research costs money, you can't avoid that.

A.A. Cunningham

"The Osprey still has no defensive gun system."

Incorrect. As announced in September 2000 all production V-22s will in fact be equipped with a GDAS 50 caliber GAU-19/A gatling gun mounted in a chin turret.

"So all the hype about the tilt-rotor being less vulnerable because it can “fly like airplane” is mostly meaningless since it still has to transition to a helicopter and fly low and slow to do its core mission."

0-220 Knots and 220-0 knots in 12 seconds means that the Osprey has a quicker egress/ingress landing zone rate than any rotary winged platform in the inventory. Couple that with greatly reduced acoustic and IR signatures and greater ballistic integrity and the Osprey is less vulnerable to ground fire than the CH-46s and CH-53s that it will replace.

Never let the facts get in the way of disseminating bogus information.

Guns are good

Sam,

In addition to my last post I think I should point this out. According to Global Security:

"The V-22 Osprey is a tiltrotor vertical/short takeoff and landing (VSTOL), multi-mission air-craft developed to fill multi-Service combat operational requirements. The MV-22 will replace the current Marine Corps assault helicopters in the medium lift category (CH-46E and CH-53D), contributing to the dominant maneuver of the Marine landing force, as well as supporting focused logistics in the days following commencement of an amphibious operation."

I don't think it's laughable to want a gun on an assault transport helicopter taking troops into an amphibious landing zone.

-Guns are good.

Guns are good

Sam,
First of all, I think POGO is saying that news coverage on weapons cuts has focused on the C-130J and F-22. Some has been paid to the V-22, but compared to the other two, very little.

No one said it is meant to be a gunship, nor that the V-22 should loiter around the battlefied. But there's a reason many Hueys and Blackhawks often ave machine guns mounted on their side doors. It's nice to suppress ground fire and keep the heads down of guys running around with MANPADS trying to kill you. It can help reduce the immediate danger when your guys get on and off the helicopters. I don't know of any "official" studies on whether guns on the Hueys in Vietnam reduced shootdowns or helped saved lives of trooping embarking and disembarking. But it seems intuitive that it would.

Your argument that the V-22 spends most of its time in airplane mode was addressed in POGO's post. So what if it flys fast and high 90% of the time, but in the 10% it doesn't--it's just as, if not more vulnerable than helicopters when they're most at risk. Follow?

And finally, although it's not certain whether a gun will eventually find its way onto the Osprey, the POGO post's ending makes it clear that the MARINES WOULD LIKE TO HAVE A GUN on it.

Guns are Good.

Sam

Plenty of media attention has been paid to the V-22. How many 60 Minutes programs have been made about the F/A-22 or C-130J? The Osprey is not designed to take troops into "the thick of battle." It is not a gunship designed to attack enemy positions. It is designed to take troops safely around or over enemy air defenses to a location the enemy is not prepared to defend. Let the armed helicopters take troops into hot LZs and see how the battle goes.
If the V-22 were armed, it would only be for emergency situations. Armaments add weight, reduce carrying capacity, slow it down. Your article doesn't mention any of these disadvantages or arming it. "Our combat helicopters with guns are downed by ground fire often enough as it is, imagine what would happen if we replace armed helicopters with the Osprey." LOL What evidence do you have that arming helicopters would reduce the number shot down in the first place? The V-22 is supposed to spend most of its time in Airplane mode, not in helicopter mode. It can transition very quickly into helicopter mode to land load and unload and take off. It is not designed to hang around the battlefield and dodge MANPADS, machineguns, and RPGs. Leave that job to the Apache and see how long it lasts.

George H

The V-22 is also being procured for the Air Force and that is another crazy situation. The AF guys drop Special Forces teams behind lines etc. The V-22 for that role is a heavyweight in electronics, with lots of see in the dark, navigate quietly and precisely. But when the troops tried to rappel down a rope the prop wash almost beats them to death. The test report was slipped down behind some file cabinet somewhere I'll bet. Oh and the props light up a radar much father away than a regular aircraft.

Another neat "feature" of the V-22 is that it has driven the development of narrow vehicles, specifically designed to get inside the cramped V-22! The alternative aircraft is a standard well proven Sikorsky helicopter with lots of room, lots of pilots with the ability to fly it and an avionics suite that already exists. The issue is long range and added tanks could provide that only when needed. Wiring some newly manufactured helos would be lots cheaper that buying V-22s!!

The comments to this entry are closed.