« Intell bill provision would weaken disclosure of conflicts of interest | Main | Resigning or Running Scared? »

Nov 17, 2004

Comments

aa

RE: Columbia Shuttle Disaster

There is a phenomena associated with a nasal spray probably German in origin, that when administered affects the sensory capacity. The problem is that subjects are not informed of the intended effect of the spray. There is a possibility that people are being used to test the product without proper informed consent.
The spray is contained in a stainless steel pen like object which the attending physician will pass off as an examination instrument.

The day of the Columbia Shuttle disaster, Kalpana Chawla may have been in the SpaceHab Module and may have been working at an instrumentation panel which was malfunctioning.

Will you check to see if video or software data was recovered to support this perceived information?

Is information posted on the NASA web site accurate? Kalpana is shown in the SpaceHab Module?

My concern is that people like Scott Peterson may be adversely affected if they are subjected to psychological/medical testing without informed consent. It hardly seems possible that this can occur, so I am assuming that if such a spray exists the manufacturer is probably testing without consent to avoid liability. And Scott McVeigh may be another example of an adverse outcome.

See Applied Digital Solutions web site. See Digital Angel web site. Also, Drs Asch and Stone did not seek consent from female patients at the UC Riverside fertility clinics.

My assumption is that Dr Asch and Dr Stone et al are not willing to assume any risk. The patient assumes all the risk and pays a substantial fee for the privilege.

Peter Jennings of ABC news featured the ID implant. The segment did not mention any adverse results from the ID implant?

The comments to this entry are closed.