« Report Reveals Some Open Gov Progress, but Also Increasing National Security Secrecy | Main | Lockheed Campaign Cash Has Flowed to Members of House Panel Probing F-22 Problems »

Sep 12, 2012

TrackBack

TrackBack URL for this entry:
http://www.typepad.com/services/trackback/6a00d8341c68bf53ef017d3c002344970c

Listed below are links to weblogs that reference 'Extensive' Oversight of Nuclear Weapons Facilities Not Such a Bad Idea, After All, Official Says:

Comments

Charles Witteck

No more oversight, which means hindsight. Taxpayers
deserve foresight! The government contracts for X, or Y
or Z, then upon non-delivery, taxpayers, again are fleeced
for "accountancy"? The body politic is in terminal disarray.

Mary Louise Mutch

Thank heavens for the Courage of one 82-year-old woman and her companions. Never undrestimate the wisdom and courage of the elderly who want to leave a safe and healthy environment behind them as a precious legacy to generations to come. Perhaps the department of Energy should hire her in an advisory position.

Skyhawkmaintainer

I suppose for this, all of the choices would be nun of the above?

Margie K. Glod

This should be researched as to how this happened in the first place, they need to really figure out, and stop it from happening again!

james o'gara

do you think he ever visited a nuclear facility?

probably has been sitting in his office and waiting for the day he can get hired by a one of the companies he supposed to regulate - then he'll find out what they're like!

The comments to this entry are closed.