« Morning Smoke: Honoring NSA Whistleblower Thomas Drake | Main | What Kool-Aid Is the Associated Press Drinking? »

Apr 13, 2011

TrackBack

TrackBack URL for this entry:
http://www.typepad.com/services/trackback/6a00d8341c68bf53ef014e87c4ea2c970d

Listed below are links to weblogs that reference Is Boeing Trying to Have It Both Ways on the 737 Next Generation?:

Comments

Mark R

Sounds like Boeing and the Tanker scandal all over again.

The GoC (PW&GSC & DND & Harper's Conservatives) Screwed us over in 2006 and ILLEGALLY disqualified MY consortium's Fully-Compliant BC-17XM submission
(better Value 8 AC avail (4 Mil, 4 Civil) vs 4 Mil)
for the C-17 ACAN (Advance Contract Award Notice - 'so called' competition)
& associated C-130J submission (mainly using ex-RAF C-130Js taken in trade for BC-17XMs, supplemented by a few new Js)
- sounds like a C-130J should qualify for a C-130J competition - Wrong, NOT in Canada Eh!,

and even somehow got Boeing to Disingenuously pull support for their own BC-17 17 (note,
Not the militarized BC-17XM from our 2006 proposal, but the BC-17 we had mentioned in an earlier unsolicited 2003 formal proposal to the GoC, and its associated re-militarized BC-17X at a much more paced schedule)
- as PWGSC/DND were Unable to Technically reject our appeal until Boeing submitted their Disengenious / Misleading fall-2006 letter,
and even lied about the 40-month development timeframe it would be ready by
(while we stuck with the period Boeing's BC-17 design team had specifically noted to us earlier and which Boeing have even been quoted as using since their disingenuous note to the GoC/us)
- reminiscent of your above statements
re: Boeing Trying to Have It Both Ways,

and then had the online support-the-military types
- of which I used to be one and even write articles supporting the military - blindly support the GoC as long as the military got the Cadillac C-17s it wanted.
So at that point, after starting to suffer through ongoing PTSD and high blood pressure, I said screw it!
The Harper Government: Disengeneous, Dishonest, Incompetent and most definitely Not Transparent.
(I'm planning to write a book about my experience.)

Disillusioned in Edmonton

The comments to this entry are closed.