« Are Contractors the 4th Branch of Government? | Main | Exposing the Dept. of Job Security »

Feb 07, 2007

Comments

Axel

Dear Readers, June 4, 2007

To avoid any misunderstanding, my recent previous June 3, 2007 above reply is also in reference to my previous replies on this page and without exception and most importantly in direct reference to the US enactment of the US death penalty which is a prepostures application(s) and assumption(s) and violates all Religious, Constitutional and Democratic Law.

Thank you for your time and consideration.

Sincerely,
Axel

Axel

Dear Readers, June 3, 2007

Please note that in my additional support for this Whistleblower Protection Legislation I have posted an additional comment post to the Government Accountability Project (GAP) and as Mr. Devine at GAP along with Mr. Swellenbach at POGO have testified at this Committee Hearing. The I am writing in response to this POGO Article that also requests 'Republicans Call on Whistleblowers'. The Article of Mr. Adam Miles at GAP entitled 'NYT Editorial on the WPEA' along with this POGO Article I hope is brought to the attention of this Congressional Committee as requested from this US Congressional Committee. The 3rd GAP Article reads as follows;

Dear Readers, June 3, 2007

I assume that the few people that have followed my recent replies on this Mr Miles GAP Article 'NYC Editorial on the WPEA.' and the POGO Article 'Republican Committee Calls on Whistleblowers' and possibly some of my other responses to POGO Articles are our US Senatorial and Congressional Legislatures and the News Media of CBS, NBC,ABC, FOX and DemocracyNow.org radio and public television. I am basically writing and most importantly to note, very briefly, to them and their Committees at this time.

Most importantly, I am writing within my continued support for this current Whistleblower Legislation to have a successful passage and resolve as, and again as intended by the many tireless forthright and proper efforts of our US Legislatures.

Please note that should I be correct that I sense a concern and anguish and that possibly some proper and forthright intent of some of our US Legislatures and hopefully others to properly and forhtrightly self-reflect for their own benefit and that of our great country, the USA, I will mention the following as I hope it will be of assistance for them to find the Courage, Strength and Bravery to find their salvation and/or the proper and forthright direction to their and/or our US Salvation.

Please allow me to express my thought and where I may assist from my prior writings as I previously mentioned in this GAP and POGO.org Articles and to those whom it may properly and forthrightly assist is that a Candidate for office who preys or complies with voter(s) misguided, error, nieveness, incompetence, ignorance although in some cases well deserved sensetivity is also guilty with the voter whom has voted to end their US Democracy, impune religion and violate all reasonable, proper and forthright Religious, Constitutional and Democratic Law.

As needed and/or requested, I will hopefully write more at a later time and/or with though expression for test case assumptions in an enlightning manner as possible.

Thank you and all for your time and consideration.

Sincerely,
Axel


Please note that from my GAP Articles, this applies and most importantly of the prepostures applciation(s) and assumption(s) of the enactment of the US Death Penalty as mentioned in my GAP reply comment to the 3 (three) postings from me at GAP within the Article of GAP's Mr. Miles entitled 'NYT Editorial on the WPEA'.

Keep well, safe, happy, warm, well and strong.

Thank you and all for your time and consideration.

Sincerely,
Axel

Axel

Dear Readers and POGO Staff, June 2, 2007

Please be apprised that I have wriiten to inform this Congressional Committee and its Honorable Members of my recent and additional intended written comments for posting. Please not that I do not have a copy of my frustrated impromptu for comment for posting, although I would be able to construct another comment if necessary and/or review my intended copy for review and/or correction as and/or if necessary.

Thank you and all for your time and consideration.

Sincerely,
Axel

Axel

Dear Ms. Beth Daly, 2/21/2007
Dear Ms. Dina Rasor,
Dear Mr. Nick Schwellenbach,

I just now found the link directly to the US Congressional Committee as mentioned in this POGO article and I have written on their e-mail request form to respectfully request the Committee to accept my blogs on this POGO Article to be forwarded to their Committe Members as requested from this Committee. I assume and know you have a limited staff, although a response on this web page as requested would be reassuring to me (Whistleblowers) that your Organization continues to appreciate and support Whistleblowers. Again, I know you have limited recourses and have an overwhelming amount of highly important issues that your superb and excellent organization and somehow in a miraculous fashon and manner are able to accomadate this formidable POGO Organization with the highest quality of information and resources to your readers.

I and/or I assume we and in hindsight and where and if applicable would and/or may prefer to express apologies, thanks and/or relevant concerns. Please allow me to mention and express my apologies that it was not and it is not my intent to offend anyone.

At your convenience, please let me know if you and/or your POGO Organization will be able to submitt to this Congressional Committee my blogs that are on this web page. I am willing to review these blogs for any review and consideration that may be mentioned and/or of concern.

Thank you and all for your time and consideration.

Sincerely,
Axel

Axel

Dear Ms. Beth Daly, 2/16/2007
Dear Ms. Dina Rasor,
Dear Mr. Nick Schwellenbach,

Good day. I hope as well as can be expected you and all are well and fine. As well as can be expected, I am well and fine.

I am writing as after several telephone calls to your facility, I briefly spoke with Mr. Schwellenbach this afternoon. I was privilaged and honored to speak with Mr. Schwellenbach and glad that he was able to release my blog to be posted on this web site and page. Please note that my prior postings have gone unanswered as along with my/this current posting.

Please accept my request that you all give your best effort to forward the postings on this page item to the Congressional Committee(s) as you have dessribed in this blog and that this Committee and (Mr. Tom Davis) has aparently requested.

Ms. Daly, upon your and POGO's review and summation(s) will you please accept my request and post on this web blog page when you have and/or havenot accomplished this task on my and/or our behalf.
(Ms. Daly as I assume you are easily able to surmise, everyone has ignored and/or abandoned and/or retaliated against this Whistleblower. I am hoping you and your POGO Organization have the bravery and courage to accomodate this task).

If you have any questions and/or concerns, please feel free to call and/or e-mail at the telephone number and/or e-mail address I have submitted to your staff.

Thank you and all for your time and consideration.

Sincerely,
Axel

Axel

I posted an additional blog yesterday evening and it has not been posted.

Axel

I thought it may be prudent for me to address this matter, the Congressional committee, POGO et all with a brief summation and perspective conclusion that is well known to some and will presumably address the concerns to identify the problems and solutions to the comfort of all within these concerns. The following are my continued suggestions for that resolve. It has been suggested from me to that a working group between myself and Mr. Stephen Kohn and Mr. Micheal Kohn of the NWC and Mr. Tom Devine and Ms. Joanne Royce of GAP form a working group to consider that an Amicus Brief be filed on my behalf (et all as necessary?) and applicable others within their Testimony before the US Senate Committee on Ethics on November 2003 or 2004 and upon the demand request of Sabersky, et all within the truth and honest respect to Law. (This intended Brief should fulfill my obligation and respect to the many Judges and Courts that have gone to these appalling and hysterical lenghts to accomadate this necessity for the intend Brief to be filed).

The Brief would demand a reconsideration for review of the Sabersky files for the complete unified resolve and reinstatement of Sabersky with the full appropriation and clearance and any other financial obligations to include Attorney Fee compensation to all relevant Individuals, Entities and Law Groups etc. Also upon this completion and in accordancewith proper respect and regard to Law it would clearly appear a class action status would appear to be highly appropriate and necessary. The Sabersky plan for a highly comprehensive, fair and equitable resolve for any and most all and/or applicable matters would be communicated at that time. (Please note that this Committe and Court(s) can uphold the (unknown) 'Shoot the Messenger' and/or ignore the Messenger even when the most serious of allegations are present or this Committee and Court(s) can allow the truth, honesty and respect for our Constitution, Laws and democracy by recalling mandate(s) and allow and provide for the reinstatement
of Sabersky.

Factual basis in part for this intended Appeal and/or working group are as follows; 1) the AFGE et all clearly and easily seen within these files have violated Sabersky and others rights to resolve and/or fair and reasonable resolve. 2) MSPB of San Francisco and Judge Lonny Bartholomew clearly and easily seen within these files have violated Sabersky and others right to resolve. 3) MSPB of Washibgton D.C. and Beth Slavet and Sussane Marshall clearly and easily seen within these files have violated Sabersky and others right to resolve. 4) David Cohen of UD DOJ and MSPB Washington D.C. and FEDCIR Advisory Committee clearly and easily seen within these files have violated Sabersky and others the rights to resolve. 5) FEDCIR clearly seen within these files could be interpreted within these files that the FEDCIR filed a misleading and/or erroneous opinion and closed these files without the necessary review for a fair and reasonable resolve. 6) New and/or ongoing information and/or evidence to US Senators and Congressional Individuals and Committees can clearly be seen and therefore show tp support a supine negligence for the violations towards and against Sabersky and others rights and/or avenue to resolve. 7) Additinal information will be made available as best and where possible.

Please note that the Sabersky plan would be accomplished at no additional expense to anyone and would bring into proper alignment the forementioned Agencies and Courts and improve the Administration of Justice as described in FEDCIR Rule #53 Judicial Conference.

As this blog has an apparent direct link to this US Congressional Committe, I hope to hear from someone within the near future.

Thank you and all for your time and consideration.

Sincerely,
Axel
2/15/2007

Axel

I forgot to mention in my prior blog that as everyone know and especialy as in Mr. devines Testimony, there are no funds for anyone for the litigation puposes alone to go to Federal District courts, much less appeals courts and most all other venues. How stupid and corrupt can all thise prominent committees and members and distinguished people think we are and apparently expect and mandate us to a seemingly relevant to be somewhat obedient to this ongoing and apparently never-ending insanity and corruption and/or corrupt and deranged despotic ongoings and/or legislative proceedings.

Axel

It appears necessary (from your POGO trackback) for your readers to have a brief response from me at this time. Please note that it appears in only this overwhelmingly brief and limited area of my response that even though this hearing heard excellent testimony and with an immediate unanimous approval with further amendments, that this hearing appears to be seemingly corrupt with this seemingly corrupt linguistic expertise and testimony for just of a few of the following minor reasons. This seemingly corrupt and usless legislation in a major part does not properly identify and address the relevant problems and solutions and only continues to bury them withim this corrupt linguistic testimony and legislation. 1) It does not end the corrupt 15c FEDCIR (Congressional?) requirement. 2) Most federal Employees and most likely all AFGE Union Federal Employees must go through the corrupt MSPB and most likely with the Corrupt AFGE Union. 3) The corrupt MSPB will be under the same corrupt pressure in any relevant case, including case assignments. 4) The corrupt MSPB can easily rule in any and every case within the 90 day period. 4) All the Federal corrupt courts can continue to use the Sabersky v DOJ (FEDCIR DoCkets 00-3446 and 02-3254) to go against any and all litigants. 6) Most importantly it does not address the 100% corrupt US Federal Courts as is mentioned and/or implied and/or inferred in everyones Testimony. 7) Everyone at that Congressional hearing must know that almost all of the Criminal Convictions under Sarbanes/Oxly have been overturned in the Federal Appeals Courts from the trial Judges deligerate and Intentional Jury instructions that continue to be used today in every Sarbanes/Oxly case. The convicted persons, if I am correct, are allowed to keep all the money and monetary gains they acquired and without further litigation against these individuals and/or entities and/or the assets. 8) A federal employee is severly restricted to one of three remedies for resolution and may never reach the MSPB and Courts.

At this moment i have a final request to Mr. Devine at GAP to stop the retaliation, nonsense and abuse upon me from His GAP and MR. Kohn's et all at the NWC and to properly and forthrightly represent me as I am the foremost and most prominent Whistleblower in this country and my case files are the only ones mentioned in the US Federal Judges Handbook (with one exception). How my name and case files where not included in this hearing appears impossible, especially as I have for many years written my Chain of Command Senator Kennedy and my Congressional person Jane Harmon who forwarded to Senator Dianne Fienstien who has wriiten me to inform me that she personnaly gave my case files to the Chairman of the US Senate Judicary committee. (Unfortunately I have received what could be construed as severe retaliation from these exact people whom are supposed to properly represent and support me and our US Constitution and our Democracy with life , liberty and the pursuit of happiness for all and with proper respect and regards to God, Man and Country and our Laws.

Thank you and all for your time and consideration.

Sincerely,
Axel

Axel

Mr. Spencer you are absolutely correct. In a few days I will communicate on this web page many items of conclusive proof that you are correct. Please note I have many former correspondences on this web site, although Beth daley and Dina Rasor have no longer allowed the left index prtion of this page to be shown. Click on a Whistleblower tag and you will find the Whistleblower blogs. I think the public both domestically and internationally is well aware of our corrupt Executive, Judicial and Legislative Branches of our Government and in direct violation of our constitution and Laws as you have indicated. Please note I am the foremost Whistleblower in this country and not one entity and or individual has properly responded to me, especially as I have directly contacted every organization, News media, Government Official and Legislature with wriiten and verbal material.

Thank you for your concern and bravery to enter your thoughts.

Axel

robert spencer

The lack of oversight in government spending,the lack of protection for those
people who would stand up against corruption, really makes me wonder if
the current administration says one thing to the public and does the opposite while
it enriches the pockets of its politically connected supporters.
I hope I am wrong,but it sure does not pass the smell test!

Connie the Contractor

Are you kidding? Davis and his staff have helped agencies terminate whistleblowers. Davis has given Scott Bloch at the Office of Special Counsel "cover." Anyone who goes to Davis with a whistleblower complaint had better make sure that the contractors agree with him or her. Otherwise, the person will be toast.

dara leyden

It was Davis' staff who stonewalled the whistleblower bill in the last congress. They're a little late to the party.

hugh

The Republican Congress abolished ALL whistleblower protections for half the Federal civilian workforce when they created the Dept. of Homeland Security.Somehow I don't believe they've had a change of heart.

The comments to this entry are closed.